Omakaase vs Building an In-House Marketing Team
The build-vs-buy decision usually isn't either/or. Here's how to think about which to choose when, and where each works best.
In-house marketing team: Hiring marketing employees directly into your business
Honest comparison — we acknowledge where In-house marketing team wins.
Most growing businesses eventually need both — in-house marketing leadership AND outside specialist support. The question is sequencing and proportion. This comparison covers honest trade-offs around total cost, capability breadth, ramp time, and the risks each model carries.
Side-by-side breakdown
Omakaase
£1,800-£8,000/$2,200-$10,000/month all-in
In-house marketing team
£60,000-£100,000+ per senior hire/year (salary + employer costs + tools)
Omakaase
Active work within 2-4 weeks of contract
In-house marketing team
3-6 months for hiring + ramp before meaningful output
Omakaase
Multi-discipline team — SEO, content, paid, design, technical
In-house marketing team
Each hire covers 1-2 disciplines; full coverage requires multiple hires
Omakaase
Embedded senior strategist but not full-time employee
In-house marketing team
Full-time, full-context, fully embedded in the business
Omakaase
Strong but second-hand context
In-house marketing team
First-hand context — lives the product daily
Omakaase
30-day notice — leave when results stop
In-house marketing team
Hiring/firing process months long, severance, legal exposure
Omakaase
Included in monthly fee
In-house marketing team
Separate cost — $1,500-$5,000/month for full SEO/content/paid tool stack
Omakaase
Track record and case studies before contract; results measurable in months
In-house marketing team
Hiring is fundamentally a 6-month bet; bad hire costs 6 months + 2x salary
The verdict
In-house marketing makes sense when: marketing is core enough to your business that it warrants a dedicated leader, you can afford the full cost (typically £200k+/year for a useful team), and you have the management bandwidth. Omakaase fits when: you need senior strategic + execution capability now, can't afford or don't want the hiring lead time, or you want to start with agency support and bring marketing in-house as you scale. Many of our best clients use both — an in-house marketing leader who works with us for execution depth.
Frequently asked questions
Is hiring in-house cheaper than an agency in the long run?
Depends on what you're comparing. A single senior marketing hire costs $80k-$140k in base salary, plus 30-40% in employer costs (taxes, benefits, equipment, tooling) — typically $110k-$200k all-in. That's $9k-$17k/month for ONE person covering 1-2 disciplines. Omakaase covers multi-discipline work at $2.2k-$10k/month with no hiring risk. The TCO favors agencies until marketing is a strategic enough function that ownership matters more than cost.
When should I hire in-house instead of using an agency?
When marketing has become a strategic differentiator (not just a support function), when you have the management bandwidth to lead it well, and when you can absorb the 6-month ramp + bad-hire risk. Most companies cross this threshold somewhere between $5M and $20M ARR depending on industry.
Can I use an agency AND have in-house marketing?
Yes — and most of our best client relationships look exactly like this. The in-house lead owns strategy, brand, and internal coordination. We handle execution depth: technical SEO, content production, paid media optimisation, design. The in-house person can focus on judgment calls instead of doing keyword research at 11pm.
Ready to see what Omakaase can do for you?
Build a custom proposal in 60 seconds — no sign-up, no sales call required. See exactly what you would get and at what price.
Build my proposal